Skip to main content

Quality Assurance Process

Reframe Visuals applies a dual-stage manual QA review to every image — primary editor completion, senior editor verification, and an unlimited revision loop before final delivery.

Direct answer

Every image at Reframe Visuals goes through a two-stage manual quality review. The primary editor completes the task, then a senior editor independently verifies the output against a service-specific checklist before delivery. If anything fails the check, it is corrected before it reaches you.

Dual-stage manual review on every image
Service-specific QA checklists per output type
Unlimited revisions within the delivery window

Stage 1: Primary editor completes the task

A trained Photoshop editor handles the requested service — clipping path, background removal, ghost mannequin, jewelry retouching, or whatever the brief specifies. The editor follows the client style reference, output format requirements, and service-specific production rules before marking the image complete.

Stage 2: Senior editor QA review

A senior editor independently reviews every image against a structured QA checklist tailored to the service type. For background removal, this includes edge quality, background purity, file format, and crop consistency. For ghost mannequin, it covers neck join accuracy, symmetry, interior volume, and pin removal. Images that fail any check are returned to the primary editor for correction before delivery.

Delivery and revision window

Once QA passes, images are delivered through your preferred channel. If your team finds anything that does not match your brief, revisions are handled directly and quickly. Most revision requests are completed and redelivered same-day.

Revision policy

Reframe Visuals includes unlimited revisions on every order. If the delivered image does not match the brief or style reference, raise the specific issue and it will be corrected — no revision cap, no extra charge. Customers who provide clear references and style specs upfront experience fewer revision cycles.

Common rejection triggers at the QA stage

Problems caught during senior editor review include ragged or aliased edges, background color variance, incorrect file format, inconsistent crop across a batch, masking artifacts, ghost mannequin neck join gaps, asymmetric garment presentation, and any output that deviates from the client brief. These are caught and corrected internally before delivery reaches the client.

Recommended next step

If you are comparing providers, start with a small proof batch. Upload up to 3 product photos, review the edited result, then decide whether to move into a paid order or larger catalog workflow.

Explore Next

Reframe CS
Chats
No previous chats
V

Visitor

Visitor

Human supportReplies in minutes
Ask about services, pricing, or your account. A real teammate replies.
Reframe CSAI

How can I help?

Ask Reframe CS.